Travel Pack 4 35L
Weight: 1,769 g.
Key details
- Length: 21 1/2 in.
What to note
Not listed by the maker: dimensions.
See all 7 specs
6 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Aer · Product page checked September 26, 2026
10 models to compare
Capacity and weight differ. Five 35-40 L packs weigh 1,100-1,769 g: Tour Lite 38L at the lower end, Travel Pack 4 35L at the upper.
The 55 L Tour Travel Pack is 25 in long; follow your airline's cabin limit.
Disclosure: GearVetted participates in the Amazon Associates Program and may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through product links on this site.
With no preferences selected: Travel Pack 4 35L is one option to compare.
Travel Pack 4 35L · first with a product link
Not listed by the maker: dimensions.
If you choose At least 38 L for capacity, the first option with a product link becomes Tour Lite Travel Pack 38L.
10 models compared; 10 have a product-page link.
The picks
Compare the details that matter to your setup.
Weight: 1,769 g.
Not listed by the maker: dimensions.
6 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Aer · Product page checked September 26, 2026
Capacity: 38 L.
Depth: 9 in.
7 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Eagle Creek · Product page checked September 26, 2026
Capacity: 55 L.
Not listed by the maker: weight, material.
5 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Eagle Creek · Product page checked September 26, 2026
Weight: 900 g.
Not listed by the maker: capacity, depth, dimensions.
4 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Eagle Creek · Product page checked September 26, 2026
Capacity: 40 L.
Depth: 9 in.
7 of 7 specs available · source checked September 26, 2026 · Source ↗
Eagle Creek · Product page checked September 26, 2026
Comparing Travel Pack 4 35L · Tour Lite Travel Pack 28L
CompareCompare
Choose up to three models to compare side by side.
0 identical specs shown. Details that do not apply to these models are omitted.
| Spec | Travel Pack 4 35LNo preferences selected. | Tour Lite Travel Pack 28LNo preferences selected. |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 35 L | Not listed by the maker |
| Weight | 1,769 g | 900 g |
| Length | 21 1/2 in | 19 in |
| Width | 13 1/2 in | 12 in |
| Depth | 9 in | Not listed by the maker |
| Material | 1680D CORDURA® ballistic nylon | 100% Recycled 1000D Polyester 100% Recycled 200D Polyester |
No preferences selected.
No preferences selected.
Travel Pack 4 35L
View at AerTour Lite Travel Pack 28L
View at Eagle Creek— = no verified listing yet. The published order is independent of links.
| Product | How it compares | Key spec | Compare | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel Pack 4 35L | Weight: 1,769 g; Length: 21 1/2 in. | Capacity: 35 L | View at Aer | |
| Tour Lite Travel Pack 28L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: weight, 900 g vs 1,769 g. | Weight: 900 g | View at Eagle Creek | |
| Tour Lite Travel Pack 38L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 38 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 38 L | View at Eagle Creek | |
| Tour Travel Pack 40L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 40 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 40 L | View at Eagle Creek | |
| Tour Travel Pack 55L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 55 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 55 L | View at Eagle Creek | |
| 35L Global Travel Pack | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: weight, 1,673 g vs 1,769 g. | Capacity: 35 L | View at Matador | |
| 45L Global Travel Pack | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 45 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 45 L | View at Matador | |
| Expandable Backpack | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 27 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 27 L | View at Tortuga | |
| Lite Backpack 40L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 40 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 40 L | View at Tortuga | |
| Pro Backpack 34L | Compared with Travel Pack 4 35L: capacity, 34 L vs 35 L. | Capacity: 34 L | View at Tortuga |
Your choices are compared with each model’s product details. A missing or conflicting value stays unknown and cannot satisfy a choice you select. The starting order helps you browse; it does not rate real-world performance.
Source dates appear with each link below. A source date does not confirm today's price or stock.
Start with published capacity and empty weight, then inspect all exterior dimensions of the remaining travel packs. The main capacity field uses the standard volume; check the linked page separately for expanded size.
The selection includes sizes that exceed some cabin allowances. Published dimensions do not establish airline acceptance, torso fit or loaded carrying comfort. Conflicting size and capacity figures remain unlisted.
Of the travel backpacks, 9 provide a capacity figure in liters.
No. These are the makers' travel packs for clothes and travel gear, and trail features such as hip-belt load carrying aren't compared here. For day hikes, a daypack comparison is the better starting point.
Each capacity is the maker's standard figure, without expansion; Tortuga's Expandable Backpack, for example, is rated at 27 liters, and its expanded size is on Tortuga's page rather than in this table. Among the five 35–40 L packs, Eagle Creek Tour Lite 38L weighs 1,100 g and Aer Travel Pack 4 35L weighs 1,769 g.
Eagle Creek's title says 28L while its spec table matches Tortuga’s standard capacity above, and the depth disagrees too, so both stay blank. That means any capacity minimum hides it, even though at 900 g it's the lightest of the nine packs with a stated weight. The 55 L Tour Travel Pack runs 25 in on its first dimension, against 19 to 23 in for every other pack, so hold it to your airline's cabin limit.
This comparison can't say. Makers' outer sizes help you rule packs in or out against an airline's published limit, but torso fit, loaded comfort and whether a gate agent accepts the bag aren't covered.